Rwhp to crank converter
WebNov 25, 2010 · 69 Posts. Discussion Starter · #1 · Jun 24, 2010. Hey guys, I thought i would post this because i found it, and i think it's very useful to those of you who want to know … WebMay 18, 2016 · The Marauder guys have found the safe limit to the 4R70W is right around 500ft lbs. The 04 GT and Mach autos (and some late run 03s) got the 4R75W which is way …
Rwhp to crank converter
Did you know?
http://wallaceracing.com/et-hp-mph.php WebApr 30, 2024 · In order to find a turbo that can support our target power we need to calculate for the drivetrain loss and multiply 600 x 1.15 = 690 If you want 600 wheel horsepower …
WebMay 31, 2016 · Again, the rwhp results depend on whose dyno you are on that day. Are we talking a Mustang dyno or a Dynojet? Mustang dyno's traditionally read lower than Dynojets. Ex: Mustang dyno = 590 rwhp vs. Dynojet = 630 rwhp. Plus, each shop's dyno is going to read different depending on how the shop sets it up. Modern Muscle Premium Member WebAug 18, 2003 · If you go with 15% for manual and 20% for auto, divide the rwhp by .85 for manual and .80 for auto. 300 rwhp would equal 352.9 flywheel hp manual or 375 auto. In …
WebDec 1, 2009 · Just curious - what do you think is a good conversion factor from rwhp to at the crank hp? One post I saw today was almost 22% increase from rwhp to crank. For some reason, I had a lower number in my head (17-18%). What do you all think is a good conversion factor? Thanks the number you had in your head is prob closer to a manual … WebApr 25, 2016 · From what I read, the conversion of Crank HP to RWHP would be a loss of 15% on a manual. What would be the % loss of an Automatic? Furthermore, what would be the MAX RWHP that a stock Automatic can take on the New Edge? Thanks :thumb: F Fitzy_2v Registered Joined Apr 19, 2016 22 Posts #2 · Apr 23, 2016 KNIGHT4000 said: Hi …
WebApr 25, 2016 · The more likely scenario is, that 506 ft-lbs, converted to Newton Meters, is 686 N-M, which can be rounded up to 700. Transmissions are generally rated for their … marcelle martinezWebJan 30, 2008 · 7,858 Posts. #5 · Jan 22, 2008. FWD is about 15% Drivetrain loss so take whp/.85 = FWHP. RWD is about 18% Drivetrain loss so take whp/.82 = FWHP. AWD is … marcelle marcelleWebJan 17, 2012 · How to calculate RWHP vs Crank HP There is no magic formula, because there are just too many variables. Some include gearing, condition of lubricants, mass of … marcelle mcdannel attorney alaskaWebMay 5, 2012 · After doing some reading on here, it seems like the baseline RWHP on a stock cts-v is sitting around 450-460 or approx 100 less than claimed crank hp. That could also be viewed as approx a 25% power loss. is there a ratio in percentage for the decrement in hp between crank hp and rwhp or is it typically the same spread up through the curve (100hp). marcelle mejalliWebMay 10, 2005 · the rule of thumb is between 10-15 but its not accurate at all. a 100 hp car has a lot less drivetrain drag on it than a 600 hp car. there so many different variables its just not possible to know crank hp other than pulling the motor out and putting it … marcelle mcdannelWebTrue HP as compared to DJHP It's not possible to give an absolute conversion factor, as it appears that dj dynos don't all read the same (my experience, other's, too - and Mag Articles and 2002 Roadracing World gsxr1000 and R1 comparison articles), but, you can take True HP from EC997's and produce an "average" djhp of of an "average" dj dyno - empirically … marcelle mazziniWebJun 14, 2009 · so 300 flywheel horsepower would equal about 240 rearwheel horsepower? If I had my choice I'd prefer to say that 500 FWHP = 400 RWHP. Seriously depending on … marcelle melton